Teams

HCC-Yablonski

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs ACAC Naylor/HoeferWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Lesley Alouf vs Carol Hoefer / Julie Rison6-1, 6-2
2025-06-01vs Westwood Seredni/Walek 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Lesley Alouf vs Kristy Seredni / Carlyle Walek5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Woodlake - Poindexter/EstesLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Caporale / Stephanie Yablonski vs Peggy McElgunn / Denise Giaccone5-7, 2-6
2025-04-29vs MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Lesley Alouf vs Eunice Williams / Kim Michael6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-19vs Salisbury Smashers - ShafferLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Kimberly Ross vs Heather Benedetti / Kristin Kim7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-15vs RCC KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Kimberly Ross vs Pam Koch / Berkeley Darr6-3, 7-6
2025-04-06vs Three Chopt Smashers - SkorupaWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Suzanne Gardner vs Michelle Yu / Melissa Skorupa6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Charlotte Caporale
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Sidney Mayer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Lauren Hutcheson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
3.04
Renee Fisher
published
2.95
Kirsten Mullaney
published
Lesley Alouf
published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Caporale + Sidney Mayer9169% games+17.4% vs expected
Stephanie Yablonski + Charlotte Caporale8459% games+7.8% vs expected
Stephanie Yablonski + Sidney Mayer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–85L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Charlotte Caporale
35W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sidney Mayer
37W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kirsten Mullaney
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Lesley Alouf
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.