Teams

V - LPCC Smart Aces

2023 USTA Adult 55 &Over · Ventura - Women 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-06vs V - LLW Royal Girlfriends C ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Nash / Felicula Tovar vs Kathryn Pisaro / Ellen Swagerty3-6, 1-6
2023-07-30vs V - LLW Royal Girlfriends C ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Michelle Soto de Carvalho vs Barb Jepson / Kimberlin Morley4-6, 5-7
2023-07-29vs V - Valley Lindo Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Gulbranson / Gina Howey vs Anne Renard / Debra Myrent6-1, 6-2
2023-07-16vs V - Valley Lindo Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesFelicula Tovar / Michelle Soto de Carvalho vs Alicia Sim / Anne Renard6-3, 6-2
2023-07-08vs V - LLW Royal Girlfriends C ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatalina Wise / Felicula Tovar vs Jennifer House / Marilyn Germann1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Jean Salcido
published
2.79
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Felicula Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.60
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.60
Mary Nash
published
2.55
Janet Talmadge
published
2.54
Catalina Wise
published 3
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.27
Penny Teague
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicula Tovar + Mary Nash0539% games−13.4% vs expected
Carol Pollock + Janet Talmadge123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Felicula Tovar + Jean Salcido033 matchesnot enough data
Jean Salcido + Catalina Wise123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jean Salcido
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Colleen Gulbranson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Felicula Tovar
32W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Penny Teague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.