Teams

Wellman

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Arp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christie Herkert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-08-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Ann Arp vs Gretchen Wagner / Catherine Leedy6-3, 6-3
2023-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Ann Arp vs Tracey Hodgson / Rachel Young6-3, 6-0
2023-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Ann Arp vs Melanie DeSilva / Kim Christensen6-3, 6-1
2023-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Casey / Kaie Wellman vs Katie Jurgenson / Sara Crate6-3, 6-4
2023-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Erin Casey vs Karen Barks / Carolyn Graeper7-5, 6-2
2023-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Ann Arp vs Cheri Martes Davis / Maryam Farinola6-1, 6-1
2023-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Ann Arp vs Michele Desmarais / Michelle Posey6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Christie Herkert vs Dolores Corley / Jing Feng2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Ann Arp
39W–27L career
0%80%20%
3.47
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Christie Herkert
30W–31L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.