Teams

HCC - Abrams

2025 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-02vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadWon 10
W#1 DoublesLara Slatniske / Dianne Albina vs Elaine Aschenbrenner / Patty Halstead6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie Healy / Michele Ironsmith vs Elaine Aschenbrenner / Patty Halstead2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLara Slatniske / Lisa Freeman vs Deena Walter / Michele Vogeley6-3, 6-3
2025-10-19vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Healy / Avery Zercoe vs Marnie Hoffman / Mary Turnes6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanet Karpan / Christina Dorothy vs Melissa Sheridan / Rebecca Evangelista4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Karen Abrams vs Deena Walter / Michele Vogeley6-3, 6-3
2025-10-05vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Pawlowski / Michele Ironsmith vs Ann Carlson / Irene Nasworthy6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Healy / Avery Zercoe vs Rebecca Evangelista / Patty Halstead6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDianne Albina / Janet Karpan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-28vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Healy / Michele Ironsmith vs Michele Vogeley / Judi Alford4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Christina Dorothy vs Ann Carlson / Irene Nasworthy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-21vs HCC Lob & Order - P. HalsteadWon 30
W#1 DoublesDianne Albina / Lara Slatniske vs Mary Turnes / Deena Walter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAvery Zercoe / Cheryl Pawlowski vs Elaine Aschenbrenner / Patty Halstead6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Freeman / Leticia Leppert vs Marnie Hoffman / Joann Suyao6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.47
Avery Zercoe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Dianne Albina
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Christina Dorothy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Katie Healy
published
4.00
Janet Karpan
published
3.90
Leticia Leppert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Lara Slatniske
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Cheryl Pawlowski
published 4
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Slatniske + Dianne Albina18456% games+4.4% vs expected
Avery Zercoe + Michele Ironsmith7068% gamesnot enough data
Michele Ironsmith + Dianne Albina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Avery Zercoe
67W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Dianne Albina
96W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Christina Dorothy
134W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Katie Healy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.08
Janet Karpan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Leticia Leppert
211W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.