Teams

8.0W EG - Sale

2023 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-21vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoseanna Gonzales / Shirley McDougall vs Jill Sanchez / Barbara Maxam1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Leach / JoAnn Pomeroy vs Schoonover Jones / Rhonda Letz0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVirginia Henry / Nell Sale vs Lindsay Ennis / Rayme Romanik3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-14vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Harvey / Shirley McDougall vs Ginger Brown / Kathy Swanson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarianne Dwight / Carol Ydens vs Judy Fleischman / Rhonda Letz1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Barry / Susan Leach vs Debra Bryan / Donna Steege1-6, 1-6
2023-09-07vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesVirginia Henry / Carol Ydens vs Janet Smith / Lindsay Ennis5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSally Harvey / Shirley McDougall vs Schoonover Jones / Kathy Swanson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Gallaher / Lea Beth Ladue vs Rayme Romanik / Donna Steege3-6, 1-6
2023-08-31vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Tarman / Virginia Henry vs Jill Sanchez / Janet Smith3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Domenici / Marianne Dwight vs Rayme Romanik / Debra Bryan0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Ydens / Lea Beth Ladue vs Schoonover Jones / Rhonda Letz4-6, 0-6
2023-08-24vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoAnn Pomeroy / Roseanna Gonzales vs Donna Steege / Barbara Maxam0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNell Sale / Susan Gallaher vs Ginger Brown / Janet Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRisana Zaxus / Lea Beth Ladue vs Lindsay Ennis / Judy Fleischman0-6, 0-6
2023-08-17vs NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Domenici / Marianne Dwight vs Barbara Maxam / Jill Sanchez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNell Sale / Risana Zaxus vs Ginger Brown / Debra Bryan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Gallaher / Roseanna Gonzales vs Judy Fleischman / Kathy Swanson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Swanson/65 & Over/8.0W60162482
28.0W EG - Sale0621634218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Shirley McDougall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Karen Domenici
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Marianne Dwight
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Nell Sale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Carol Ydens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Lea Beth Ladue
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Risana Zaxus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Susan Leach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Beth Barry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
JoAnn Pomeroy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roseanna Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Gallaher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Tarman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Virginia Henry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Domenici + Carol Ydens2739% games−11.2% vs expected
Shirley McDougall + Sally Harvey1540% gamesnot enough data
Roseanna Gonzales + Nell Sale224 matchesnot enough data
Roseanna Gonzales + JoAnn Pomeroy044 matchesnot enough data
Nell Sale + Carol Ydens044 matchesnot enough data
Lea Beth Ladue + Risana Zaxus044 matchesnot enough data
Roseanna Gonzales + Shirley McDougall123 matchesnot enough data
Nell Sale + Susan Gallaher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley McDougall
18W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Karen Domenici
36W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Marianne Dwight
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Nell Sale
57W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carol Ydens
33W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Lea Beth Ladue
52W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Risana Zaxus
33W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
Susan Leach
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Beth Barry
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
JoAnn Pomeroy
37W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roseanna Gonzales
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Harvey
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Gallaher
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Tarman
2W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Virginia Henry
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.