← Teams

VTC-Darling

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Ericka Nelson
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Amy Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Phyllis Ghazi
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Ericka Nelson vs Wanda Ng / Janice Kuo6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Alana Rhea vs Betty Roux / Abbie Hover6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMolly Wilson / Amy Hicks vs Rosalie Trevejo / Manisha Thakkar6-3, 7-5
2022-03-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Karen Simon / Jenell Henson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Stephanie Smith vs Jan Boyd / Beverly Placko1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Heidi Palena vs Christina Melander / Valerie Neill6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Teresa Darling vs Joanna Asia Wagner / Elizabeth Arwood6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Patricia Nierenberg vs Rose Lee / Barbara Lolich6-0, 6-0
2022-02-12Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Jane King Ayers / Rachel Nies6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Amy Hicks vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPhyllis Ghazi vs Devrie Brennan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBridget Raach / Heidi Kjos vs Jean Schnadig / Sherie Briggs7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlana Rhea / Amy Hicks vs Angela Diaz de Leon / Samanta Rodriguez Silva6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Sally Papadimas / Sydney Smith6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Stephanie Smith vs Joan Jasper / Alyssa Rucker6-1, 6-0
2022-01-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Alana Rhea vs Rachel Young / Edwardeen Hilts6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEricka Nelson vs Desiree Bliss3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Teresa Darling vs Kate Quisling / Kathy Cooke6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlana Rhea / Heidi Palena vs Kathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-09Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesRobin Burak / Heidi Palena vs Jody Yates / Michelle Roach6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHeidi Kjos vs Melissa Tom6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Rebecca Griffith vs Yayun Tung / Minnie Bautista6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Hicks / Molly Wilson vs Kristie Mills / Keiko Okumura6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3.5
Ericka Nelson
43W–59L career
17%83%0%
3.08
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Amy Hicks
57W–67L career
2%98%0%
2.71
3
Phyllis Ghazi
19W–52L career · type A
34%66%0%
2.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.