Teams

King Summer 2026

2026 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MX S26 (FRI)

14 players · average NTRP 4.58 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-26vs Estey-Alexander 9.0 - S2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTucker Combs / Isabel Thiner vs Andrea Boado / Chase Johnson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlex King / Anna Nguyen vs Genevieve Swanson / Tommy Entwistle2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Schnabel / Nicholas Hoelmer vs Klenton Willis / Isabella Lambert6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-23vs Martinson: Bee Farm Summer 2026Split 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Lee / Alesha Baerenwald vs Aaron Chung / Malini Wijesinghe6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Wall / Isabel Thiner vs Lucas LeDoux / Stacy Katsiyiannis6-2, 6-3
2026-07-21vs Konjo Summer 2026Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Schnabel / Nicholas Hoelmer vs Thomas Prittinen / Cami Jarnot4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlex King / Emma Wu vs Matthew Narr / Anne Cammack6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Martinson: Bee Farm Summer 2026Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmma Wu / Tucker Combs vs Brenda Martinson / Taylor Hanson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJason Thiner / Charlotte Bowles vs David Crevier / Sara Ormseth3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlex King / Jessica Schnabel vs Amy Dean / Phillip Chase6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-12vs SmileySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlesha Baerenwald / Nicholas Hoelmer vs Cynthia Kozloff / Jakub Belik4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlex King / Rachael Nazy vs Christopher Greba / Mona Oenning6-1, 6-4
2026-06-09vs Estey-Alexander 9.0 - S2026Won 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Lee / Rachael Nazy vs Andrea Boado / Chase Johnson5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesIsabel Thiner / Jack Nazy vs Sam Hobbs / Isabella Lambert3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Lum / Varsha Rathore vs Genevieve Swanson / Tommy Entwistle6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-15vs Konjo Summer 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Lee / Rachael Nazy vs Hayley Helberg / Torin Yang6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJack Nazy / Isabel Thiner vs Madeleine Schneider / Isaiah Rubin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVarsha Rathore / Ryan Lum vs Yuko Goodwin / Matthew Edin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-08vs SmileyLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsabel Thiner / Scott Wall vs Christopher Kuna / Cynthia Kozloff4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlesha Baerenwald / Alex King vs Paul Kilburg / Amy Mitchell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Abdella / Anna Nguyen vs Christopher Greba / Martha Ginder1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 9.0 MX S26 (FRI)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Estey-Alexander 9.0 - S202644131127235
2Konjo Summer 202644111328223
3Martinson: Bee Farm Summer 202644121229224
4King Summer 20264491535245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Charlotte Bowles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.52
Varsha Rathore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Jack Nazy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.45
Emma Wu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
Alex King
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Tucker Combs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Rachael Nazy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Nicholas Hoelmer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Alesha Baerenwald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Isabel Thiner
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.94
Jessica Schnabel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Jason Thiner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.86
Will Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.74
Scott Abdella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Thiner + Isabel Thiner10356% games+4.3% vs expected
Will Holcomb + Alesha Baerenwald6069% gamesnot enough data
Alex King + Jessica Schnabel2345% gamesnot enough data
Emma Wu + Nicholas Hoelmer314 matchesnot enough data
Alex King + Alesha Baerenwald123 matchesnot enough data
Jack Nazy + Rachael Nazy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Charlotte Bowles
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
4.86
Varsha Rathore
43W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.52
5
Jack Nazy
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.50
4.5
Emma Wu
31W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Alex King
67W–61L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
Tucker Combs
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
Rachael Nazy
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Nicholas Hoelmer
35W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Alesha Baerenwald
34W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Isabel Thiner
62W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jessica Schnabel
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Jason Thiner
90W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Will Holcomb
47W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Scott Abdella
23W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.