Teams

Tipton-Mendoza/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-30vs Gustin/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hernandez-gomez / Ketki Sheth vs Jackie Hone / Angela Gustin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatharine Brosnan vs Annette Thompson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAshley Tipton / Kira Crocker vs Misty Gouge / Savannah Johnson4-6, 0-6
2024-11-16vs Bagwell/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracy Serrano / Katharine Brosnan vs Cheri Arnsdorff / Emily Stiner6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHilary Brooks vs Hannah Frame6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Tipton / Loreto Weaver vs Joy Bray / Ashley Webb3-6, 6-7
2024-10-26vs Gustin/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracy Serrano / Loreto Weaver vs Angela Gustin / Emilie Harris6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mendoza / Lisa Cobb vs Annette Thompson / Emma Poindexter3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Hilary Brooks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Katharine Brosnan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.45
Audrey Stokely
published 2.5
2.43
Ashley Tipton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Ketki Sheth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Andrea Hernandez-gomez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kira Crocker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Loreto Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tracy Serrano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary Brooks + Ashley Tipton3351% games+0.1% vs expected
Hilary Brooks + Jennifer Mendoza303 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Brooks + Katharine Brosnan213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Jennifer Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary Brooks
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Katharine Brosnan
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Audrey Stokely
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Ashley Tipton
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Ketki Sheth
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Andrea Hernandez-gomez
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Kira Crocker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Cobb
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Loreto Weaver
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Serrano
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.