Teams

OSB:18& 4.0M:Sobolewski/Peterson

2024 ECT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

20 players · average NTRP 3.85 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-04vs MIS:18& 4.0M:Strickler/HerbertLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Gannon / Michael Diorio vs Ken Bengtson / Andy Strickler6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBen Citrin / David Peterson vs Robert Gay / Stuart Titus7-5, 6-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Gage / Paul Sobolewski vs Glen Herbert / Thomas la Fauci4-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs LS:18& 4.0 M:Kirwan/MukhopadhyayWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Diorio / John Gannon vs Scott Dunn / Matthew Goldreich7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBen Citrin / Dirk Plas vs Agnish Mukhopadhyay / Lee Howard6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIhssane Khatib / Thomas Noniewicz vs Edwin Cardenas / Joe Binks7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-07vs PV:Pond View 4.0:CuquaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBen Citrin / Dirk Plas vs John Groton / Terence McAndrew3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDaniel Kurpaska vs Ryan Teixeira6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Diorio / Paul Malafronte vs Greg Ferraro / Huntington Welch6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn M Dusza / Andrew Bowler vs Thomas Kearney / Michael Cuqua3-6, 1-6
2023-12-10vs GF:18& 4.0 M:Deixler/WhiteWon 31
W#1 DoublesPaul Malafronte / John Gannon vs Charles Woodward / Austin Paresi3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Peck vs Alex Hetherington7-6, 2-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Peterson / John M Dusza vs Philip Dinauer / Gilles Marchand2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIhssane Khatib / Craig Cooke vs Hong Guo / John Cianciolo6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-19vs PV:Pond View 4.0:CuquaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn M Dusza / John Gannon vs Barry Manfredi / Stephen Kemper2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Peterson / Andrew Bowler vs Huntington Welch / Ryan Teixeira5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCraig Cooke / Paul Sobolewski vs Benjamin Farman / Matthew Rei5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-05vs LS:18& 4.0 M:Kirwan/MukhopadhyayWon 31
W#1 DoublesPaul Malafronte / John Gannon vs Albert Kirwan / Matthew Goldreich4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Kurpaska vs Rahul Chandrasekaran7-5, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Peterson / Ihssane Khatib vs Agnish Mukhopadhyay / Edwin Cardenas1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bowler / Stephen P Dix vs Joe Binks / Riju Thomas7-5, 6-2
2023-10-21vs MIS:18& 4.0M:Strickler/HerbertWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Sobolewski / Ihssane Khatib vs Ken Bengtson / Rob Carron4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Peck vs Andy Strickler6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Peterson / Thomas Noniewicz vs Nicanor Lucas / David Miles6-1, 7-5
2023-10-01vs GF:18& 4.0 M:Deixler/WhiteLost 13
W#1 DoublesJohn M Dusza / David Peterson vs Christian Ciampaglio / John Lewin6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Gage vs Charles Woodward4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Bowler / Stephen P Dix vs Hong Guo / Gilles Marchand2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAndrew Montgomery / Craig Cooke vs Anthony Luongo / Gregory Woodward1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:18& 4.0 M:Deixler/White08191230268
2OSB:18& 4.0M:Sobolewski/Peterson08181335299
3MIS:18& 4.0M:Strickler/Herbert08151736300
4LS:18& 4.0 M:Kirwan/Mukhopadhyay08141640310
5PV:Pond View 4.0:Cuqua08122043321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Peck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Michael Diorio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.92
John Gannon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Daniel Kurpaska
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
David Peterson
published 4
Dirk Plas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Ihssane Khatib
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Ben Citrin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
John M Dusza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Jon Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Craig Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.37
Andrew Bowler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephen P Dix
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Thomas Noniewicz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Bob Hester
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
John Gage
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
David Siniscalco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Andrew Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Malafronte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Sobolewski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Malafronte + Paul Sobolewski7652% games+7.4% vs expected
Paul Malafronte + John Gannon12257% games+3.3% vs expected
Ben Citrin + Dirk Plas2344% games+1.7% vs expected
Jon Alvarez + Ben Citrin4449% games−7.0% vs expected
Stephen P Dix + Andrew Bowler3346% gamesnot enough data
Stephen P Dix + Dirk Plas4158% gamesnot enough data
Ben Citrin + John Gannon224 matchesnot enough data
Craig Cooke + Thomas Noniewicz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Peck
8W–1L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Diorio
42W–36L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.99
John Gannon
71W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Daniel Kurpaska
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Peterson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dirk Plas
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ihssane Khatib
19W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ben Citrin
35W–48L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
John M Dusza
27W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jon Alvarez
15W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Craig Cooke
53W–31L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Andrew Bowler
50W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
Stephen P Dix
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.30
Thomas Noniewicz
69W–39L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Bob Hester
32W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Gage
30W–31L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
David Siniscalco
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Andrew Montgomery
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Paul Malafronte
60W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Sobolewski
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.