Teams

Davis/Choros 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 18 · 3.0 Mxd Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / David Vick vs Doug Heberle / Lara Heberle6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRhett Brown / Sloane McPeak vs Jeff Cunningham / Whitney Oakley6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Kanakanui / Daniel Kanakanui vs Kathy Falls / Ryan Preda3-6, 4-6
2026-07-30vs Schuster 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshton Choros / Will Sagerdahl vs Jack Royals / Suki Gutierrez1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHannah Richey / Trae Michael vs Tessa Olinger / Ike Nwosu4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlexa Smith / David Vick vs Hannah Miller / Houston Lawing6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Richey / Arthur Gardiner vs Meredith Lantz / Rick Williamson6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kanakanui / Sloane McPeak vs Gene LeFevre / Tamieka Howell6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Vick / Ginger Ballard vs Rachel Bryant / Ashton Oakley6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlexa Smith / Arthur Gardiner vs Kathy Falls / Eric McFarlin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Schuster 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / Arthur Gardiner vs Suki Gutierrez / Nithyananthan Yogalingam6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSloane McPeak / Hudson Reynolds vs Graceanne Schuster / Jack Royals6-1, 6-3
2026-06-30vs Schuster 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshton Choros / Arthur Gardiner vs Nithyananthan Yogalingam / Kayla Perkinson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRhett Brown / Sloane McPeak vs Peyton Fowler / Erica Jurney-Harrelson6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTrae Michael / Hannah Richey vs Ike Nwosu / Tessa Olinger5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAlexa Smith / David Vick vs Rick Fowler / Margaret Yoder6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHannah Richey / Hudson Reynolds vs Rick Williamson / Hannah Miller6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWill Sagerdahl / Julia Kanakanui vs Pablo Araya / Taylor Henderson4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kanakanui / Sloane McPeak vs Jeff Cunningham / Rachel Bryant6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArthur Gardiner / Ginger Ballard vs Doug Heberle / Lara Heberle6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDavid Vick / Alexa Smith vs Sean Bruton / Kathy Falls6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kanakanui / Sloane McPeak vs Pablo Araya / Hannah Miller6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesArthur Gardiner / Ashton Choros vs James McIntyre / Meredith Lantz6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulia Kanakanui / Hudson Reynolds vs Houston Lawing / Angela Kerr6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Mxd Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Davis/Choros 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PM8121615162
2Hizer/Pinetop 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PM45131428213
3Schuster 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PM3591533222
4Araya/GRETA 18s 3.0 Mixed Thurs PM2681633233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ginger Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.15
Arthur Gardiner
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.15
Sloane McPeak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Hannah Richey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Ashton Choros
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
David Vick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Daniel Kanakanui
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Julia Kanakanui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hudson Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rhett Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexa Smith + David Vick3553% games+4.5% vs expected
Sloane McPeak + Rhett Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Sloane McPeak + Daniel Kanakanui303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Ballard
90W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Arthur Gardiner
20W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Sloane McPeak
32W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Hannah Richey
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Ashton Choros
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
David Vick
13W–17L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Daniel Kanakanui
8W–1L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Julia Kanakanui
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Hudson Reynolds
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhett Brown
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.