Teams

LLTC - Racquet Knights

Tri Level · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 14 7:00 PM
vs N/A
Kit Joseph Shum
2026-08-24vs Lost Forest - TendiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesCory Ehlenbach / Brock Hamlin vs Jeff Hechler / Deion Pena7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBarrett von Blon / Mark Etienne vs Matthew McKillip / Alex Roushani2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoshua Ku / Victor Nguyen vs Grant Lopez / Bill Zindler7-5, 6-2
2026-08-17vs MPTC - Triple TheoryWon 20
W#2 DoublesBarrett von Blon / Cameron Lim vs Daniel Young / Alan Lee6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSanjay Nomi / Michel Fonseca vs Jonathan Inaba / Chris Tan6-2, 6-4
2026-08-03vs MPTC - LinaresWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnthony Nguyen / Joshua Ku vs Marco A Sandoval / Victor Lee6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCameron Lim / Mark Etienne vs Van Truong / Shine Lin6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSanjay Nomi / Brock Hamlin vs Thomas Weaver / Philip Wallace6-4, 6-1
2026-07-27vs LLTC - Ball SlappersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKit Joseph Shum / Antonio Garcia vs Robert Saldana / Griffin Evans1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrock Hamlin / Cory Ehlenbach vs Thomas Ngo / Matthew Liu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-20vs MPTC - Good GuysLost 02
L#2 DoublesAntonio Garcia / Mark Etienne vs Charles Cogan / Kawai Fregly7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichel Fonseca / Sanjay Nomi vs John Davis / Stephane Couderc5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Racquet Knights3193895
2MPTC - Deadpool3193998
3LLTC - Dad Bods (Tri)318410104
4Lost Forest - Tendies317511100
5MPTC - Linares133920129
6MPTC - Triple Theory0421020132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Joshua Ku
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Mark Etienne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Brandon Sek
published 4
3.76
Antonio Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kit Joseph Shum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cameron Lim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Barrett von Blon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Brock Hamlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Cory Ehlenbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Michel Fonseca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Sanjay Nomi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tri Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kit Joseph Shum + Antonio Garcia6352% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joshua Ku
36W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.39
Mark Etienne
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Brandon Sek
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Antonio Garcia
46W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Kit Joseph Shum
37W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Cameron Lim
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Barrett von Blon
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Brock Hamlin
19W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Cory Ehlenbach
37W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.50
Michel Fonseca
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Sanjay Nomi
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Tri Pham
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.