Teams

Pharr/55/4.0/W/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 4.0 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-24vs Landry/55/4.0/W/BTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGina Bihm / Amy Bowman vs Tracy Elliott / Becky McFarlain6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Pharr / Lynn Ferry-Nelson vs Suzie Morrison / Donna Bryan1-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs Landry/55/4.0/W/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Gordon / Lynn Ferry-Nelson vs Melissa Flurry / Jennifer Frederick4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Bruscato / Amy Bowman vs Tracy Elliott / Donna Bryan4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / Debra Richardson vs Becky McFarlain / Shelly Valiulis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-28vs Landry/55/4.0/W/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesGina Bihm / Denise Gordon vs Tracy Elliott / Suzie Morrison1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Pharr / Sandra Botzong vs Sue Landry / Becky McFarlain7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Landry/55/4.0/W/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Bruscato / Sandra Botzong vs Shelly Valiulis / Donna Bryan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / Debra Richardson vs Laura Hogg / Keri Fidelak5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Pharr / Kirita Windham vs Sue Landry / Becky McFarlain6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Landry/55/4.0/W/BTC4093893
2Pharr/55/4.0/W/BTC043918121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Cheryl Upchurch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Gina Bihm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Sandra Botzong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Kirita Windham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Amy Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Samantha Bruscato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Debra Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Karen Pharr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Karen Sibert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Lora Slack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lora Slack + Karen Sibert191151% games+6.9% vs expected
Cheryl Upchurch + Debra Richardson101746% games−11.6% vs expected
Sandra Botzong + Karen Pharr1541% games−15.4% vs expected
Amy Bowman + Gina Bihm3255% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Botzong + Kirita Windham123 matchesnot enough data
Kirita Windham + Karen Pharr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Upchurch
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
72W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Gina Bihm
26W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.62
Sandra Botzong
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kirita Windham
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Amy Bowman
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Samantha Bruscato
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Debra Richardson
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.44
Karen Pharr
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.37
Karen Sibert
43W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Lora Slack
51W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.