Teams

Treviso Bay - K. Barger

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-08vs COLLIER / WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Sistla / Louise Decker vs Corey Stranger / Mia Delk6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-12-01vs Players Club - ShelineLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Kathy Hamilton vs Crystie Ciriello / Susan Dow2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-17vs Players Club - HarperWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Kathy Hamilton vs Liz Wensley / Robin Harper6-1, 6-4
2022-11-14vs Cambier - DoubleTrouble -TrombleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Louise Decker vs Natalie Jennings / Ilene Flack7-5, 6-3
2022-11-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Lauri Garvey vs Faith Irwin / Stephanie Daigle6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-03vs Players Club - KropkoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Louise Decker vs Patricia Freeman / Sharon Oppenheimer4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Barger / Cheryl Rauch vs Lisa McNichol / Laura Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-27vs MarcoYMCA - L.KeelyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Louise Decker vs Dana Bursch / Carolyn Marek6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Barger / Cheryl Rauch vs Mary Defalco / Janet Spence3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Cathy Miles
published 3.5
3.26
Denise Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kathleen Barger
published
Kathy Hamilton
published
Katie Boyer
published
Lauri Garvey
published
Louise Decker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louise Decker + Cheryl Rauch2456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Miles
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Kathleen Barger
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Hamilton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Boyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauri Garvey
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Louise Decker
47W–46L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.