Teams

BC-Peninsula/PattiGuerraYork

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-23vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 20
W#1 DoublesCeleste Torres / Mel Cabral vs Tara Aviel / Timothy Bryant6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEvangeline Roxas-Butlig / Richard Butlig vs Diane Pryzbylo / Lee Breisacher6-4, 6-3
2025-08-02vs BC-MCC/KariCarpinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesPrama Bhatt / Mel Cabral vs Thomas Thompson / Amy Eastman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-30vs BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodaniLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarc Marini / Karie Lanterman vs Nathan Palmer / Denise Sands6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-26vs BC-LLW-MCC/LeslieLancryLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / John Lanterman vs Ouriel Lancry / Leslie Lancry2-6, 1-6
2025-07-13vs BC-MiraCosta/JackieKimWon 10
W#2 DoublesCeleste Torres / Mel Cabral vs David Lam / Elizabeth Park6-2, 7-5
2025-07-06vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdeline Hui-Bon-Hoa / Mel Cabral vs Timothy Bryant / Diane Pryzbylo6-3, 6-0
2025-06-28vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCeleste Torres / Mel Cabral vs Jillian Panasewicz / Christian Capper7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEvangeline Roxas-Butlig / Tets Hosoda vs Gail Schirm / Vitaliy Rusakov7-6, 7-5
2025-06-14vs BC-MCC/KariCarpinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesPrama Bhatt / Mel Cabral vs Corey Brown / Gina Chodler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Marc Marini vs Jeff Goldman / Lori White6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
John Loo
published
3.85
Richard Butlig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.41
Mel Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
TINA ZIMMER
published
3.33
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
published 3.5
3.26
Maki Jerden
published
3.25
Jennifer Lee Loy
published
3.24
Prama Bhatt
published
3.20
Asako Fujii
published 3.5
3.08
Sonomi Deguchi
published
3.05
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
2.96
Mary Ann Foard
published
2.82
Philicia Endelman
published
Emilie Mejia
published 3
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
John Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jay Lalkiya
published
Kurt Rapelje
published
Marc Marini
published
Sara Butler
published
Wade Guang
published
Wilfrido Mejia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evangeline Roxas-Butlig + Richard Butlig10365% games+8.9% vs expected
Celeste Torres + Mel Cabral7060% games+6.3% vs expected
Karie Lanterman + John Lanterman143240% games−7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Loo
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Richard Butlig
101W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Mel Cabral
141W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
TINA ZIMMER
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Maki Jerden
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Lee Loy
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Prama Bhatt
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Asako Fujii
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Sonomi Deguchi
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Patricia Guerra York
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Mary Ann Foard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Philicia Endelman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Emilie Mejia
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
John Lanterman
53W–116L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jay Lalkiya
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kurt Rapelje
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Marini
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Butler
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wade Guang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilfrido Mejia
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.