Teams

BC-WestEnd/ColleenJohnson7.065

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 13 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
Sep 20 2:00 PM
West End Tennis & Health Club
Sep 27 2:00 PM
Ernie Howlett Park
Oct 3 2:00 PM
Ernie Howlett Park
Oct 4 2:00 PM
West End Tennis & Health Club
Oct 18 2:00 PM
West End Tennis & Health Club
Oct 25 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
2026-08-30vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Johnson / Barbara Hemmerich vs Karin Chafetz / Mina Jorgensen6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKAORI MINAGI / Jae Kim vs Milagros Holub / Shizuko Takayasu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · BC Women - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian7.0000000
2BC-WestEnd/ColleenJohnson7.065000000
3BC-AltaVista/LindaLayton7.065000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rie Miyake
published
3.60
Kathleen Callahan
published
3.47
KAORI MINAGI
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Elizabeth Rogers
published
3.20
Colleen Johnson
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Dalton
published
3.16
Cheryl Williams
published 3.5
3.10
Julie Mazor
published
3.04
Barbara Hemmerich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Huong Mary Lai
published
3.01
Marie Bald
published
2.90
Linda Snyder
published 3
2.69
Diane Pryzbylo
published 3
2.57
Cheryl Unrein
published 3
Renate Snow-Poe
published
Terry Paine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams + Barbara Hemmerich6748% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rie Miyake
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kathleen Callahan
18W–10L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
KAORI MINAGI
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Elizabeth Rogers
22W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Colleen Johnson
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Susan Dalton
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cheryl Williams
85W–155L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Julie Mazor
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Hemmerich
79W–90L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
Huong Mary Lai
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Marie Bald
1W–11L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Linda Snyder
108W–99L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Diane Pryzbylo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cheryl Unrein
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Renate Snow-Poe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Paine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.