Teams

EB: Garceau

2023 RI Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-07-20vs RP: It Was All A Dream/LombardoLost 03
L#2 DoublesLeo Garceau / Michael Plummer vs Joseph Bixby / Jeremy Scott4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesVance Antonopoulos vs Matthew Brindamour6-7, 6-3, 1-2
L#3 DoublesMartin Max Cox / Frank Chin vs Stephen Aldous / Jonathan Marland4-6, 1-6
2023-07-18vs FC: Marlander/Marren/FriedlanderWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Plummer / Cole Coffey vs Norman Hale / Alexander Scott6-2, 6-4
2023-07-18vs RP: BoninWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Rawley / Max Dekle vs Jason Cordeiro / Joe Branco7-6, 6-4
2023-07-17vs HOF: LOBsters/HoffmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCole Coffey / Frank Chin vs Liam Zizza / Manny Barros6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Plummer / Martin Max Cox vs Alex Dejarnatt / Joshua Hoffman3-6, 2-6
2023-07-16vs RP: BoninLost 01
L#2 DoublesLou Pereira / Max Dekle vs Neil Chapralis / Howard Yang4-6, 0-6
2023-06-25vs RP: Fontaine/RacineLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Persson vs Mike Carvalhal1-6, 5-7
2023-06-25vs RP: It Was All A Dream/LombardoLost 02
L#2 DoublesFrank Chin / Michael Plummer vs Jeff Mcvay / Stephen Aldous4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeo Garceau / Vance Antonopoulos vs Manny Pacheco / Matthew Brindamour1-6, 6-3, 4-6
2023-06-15vs FC: Marlander/Marren/FriedlanderLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeo Garceau / Michael Plummer vs Daniel Belhumeur / Matthew Muzrall5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Cole / Frank Chin vs Jason Bain / Norman Hale0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Goldstein / Michael Persson vs Dalica Shatee / Michael Lefebvre6-2, 7-6
2023-06-08vs RP: Fontaine/RacineLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeo Garceau / Michael Plummer vs Scott Racine / Peter B Miller1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Chin / Martin Max Cox vs David OConnell / Sean Murray1-6, 1-6
2023-06-01vs RP: Green/LarocqueLost 04
L#1 SinglesRobert Fine vs Mikail Begin5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeo Garceau / Michael Plummer vs Michael Arden / Phillip Green3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesThomas Cole vs Justin Allen4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Chin / Mark Gemma vs Saulius Ziukas / Chris Caliri7-6, 2-6, 2-5
2023-04-23vs RP: Green/LarocqueWon 40
W#1 DoublesRobert Fine / Frank Chin vs Stephen Collins / Brendan McNeil6-7, 6-4, 4-2
W#1 SinglesRobert Ovoian vs Will Chasse6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMax Dekle vs David DosReis6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Plummer / Cole Coffey vs Rob Lynch / Michael Arden7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Mark Gemma
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.28
Michael Plummer
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Vance Antonopoulos
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cole Coffey
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.10
Robert Ovoian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Robert Fine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Frank Chin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Leo Garceau
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.00
Rahul Yadav
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Martin Max Cox
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Max Dekle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Michael Persson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Robert Goldstein
published
Roy Lopes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Thomas Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Plummer + Cole Coffey4452% games+10.1% vs expected
Leo Garceau + Michael Plummer1736% games−6.0% vs expected
Leo Garceau + Frank Chin2540% games−7.3% vs expected
Frank Chin + Robert Fine2346% gamesnot enough data
Leo Garceau + Roy Lopes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Gemma
20W–31L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Michael Plummer
81W–70L career · 15 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Vance Antonopoulos
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cole Coffey
34W–21L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Ovoian
31W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Robert Fine
21W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Frank Chin
34W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Leo Garceau
45W–94L career · 8 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Rahul Yadav
14W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Martin Max Cox
16W–37L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Max Dekle
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Persson
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Goldstein
40W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roy Lopes
18W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Cole
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.