Teams

SFV Mix Them Up

SFV-Mixed 18 & Over · SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesLisa Gechtman / Dhruv Sareen vs Michelle Zhong / Marcus Liou1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMikaela Nagler / Todd Nagler vs Stella Ko / Jimmy Lee3-6, 2-6
2021-08-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Dhruv Sareen vs Ramon Osa / Raquel Andal3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Gechtman / Dhruv Sareen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-25vs SFV Up Your AlleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Darren Chu vs Ani Aratounians / Mark Gasper6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Andelson / Dhruv Sareen vs Delia Holguin / Antonio Grice6-4, 6-3
2021-07-18vs SFV AV StormersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Nagler / Mikaela Nagler vs Alan Esguerra / Miranda Prescott6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-27vs SFV Toluca Lake LobstahsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Gary Goldberger vs Kristy Swailes / Benjamin Hayes6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Todd Nagler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Alisha Shohet
published 4.5
4.14
Dhruv Sareen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Lily Tucker
published
3.86
Diane Perryman
published 4
3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
3.78
David McFarland
published 4
3.67
Dennis Mitchell
published 4
3.65
Kathrina Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Robin Hittelman
published 4
3.56
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.39
Lisa Gechtman
published
3.10
Denise Joan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Darren Chu404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Todd Nagler
71W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Alisha Shohet
174W–64L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Dhruv Sareen
71W–45L career · 6 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
Lily Tucker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
David McFarland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Dennis Mitchell
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Robin Hittelman
76W–110L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.56
Lisa Gechtman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Denise Joan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.