← Teams

SHC-Butrick

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Thomas MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Rufus Timberlake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Patrick Priest
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Pete Baughman
published 3
2.67
Dave Gillard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Kerry Sweet
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.61
William Place
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
John Slominski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Scott Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results7 ties
2022-11-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKerry Sweet / Dave Gillard vs DeWayne Ledbetter / Scott Dickinson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Place / Rufus Timberlake vs Jonathan Guinn / Octavian Tudorache6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames North / Patrick Priest vs Robert Crawford / Dave Hardman6-0, 6-0
2022-11-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKerry Sweet / Patrick Priest vs Ed de la Fuente / William Seidl6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Place / Larry Butrick vs Kenneth Carter / Lars Kasch6-3, 6-4
2022-11-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKerry Sweet / Chris Keefer vs Wesley Eader / Kevin Grant6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDave Gillard / Rufus Timberlake vs Stephen Galati / James King6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Patrick Priest vs Steve Elmer / Brian Harvey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-16Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Priest / John Slominski vs Dirk Jacobs / Monte Gonzales6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKerry Sweet / Chris Keefer vs Wes Milligan / Ryan Owens6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDave Gillard / Kerry Sweet vs Keith Westrum / Terrence Trausch7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / William Place vs Norman Langston / Richard Nobleman6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Mandel / Eli Lamb vs John Short / Lee Kriebaum6-3, 7-5
2022-10-01Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRufus Timberlake / Kerry Sweet vs Rex Smith / Tom Finnerty6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Keefer / Thomas MacDonald vs Dan Pope / Reza Kalantari6-4, 6-2
2022-09-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesThomas MacDonald / Rufus Timberlake vs Paul Garrahan / Zachary Wright7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Slominski / Larry Butrick vs David Graham / Brian Hefele6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDave Gillard / Chris Keefer vs Matt Curtis / Kip Stevenson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Thomas MacDonald
54W–33L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Rufus Timberlake
23W–35L career
1%86%13%
2.89
3
Patrick Priest
52W–49L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Pete Baughman
13W–16L career · type S
8%91%1%
2.70
3
Dave Gillard
36W–41L career
6%94%0%
2.67
3
Kerry Sweet
31W–63L career
5%95%0%
2.65
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50
0
John Slominski
16W–37L career
not enough data
—
0
Scott Mandel
21W–17L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.