Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 55AW7.0B

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Francesca Hernaez
published 4.5
3.90
Amy Putty
published 4
3.86
Yeli Hohban
published
3.61
Vivi Zhang
published
3.46
Soo Pae
published
3.45
Lori Reading-Foster
published
3.45
Sylvia McCarthy
published
3.40
Michelle Weeks
published
3.40
Tatiana Shakulina
published
3.39
Alisha Testa
published 3.5
3.37
Laurie Hanschu
published
3.37
Lori Anderson
published
3.29
Maribel Gregory
published
3.27
Julie Kawahara
published
3.24
Lauren Pugh
published
3.17
Margie Sasaura
published
3.17
Janelle Schultz
published
2.99
Leigh McNeely
published
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Anderson + Maribel Gregory5063% games+5.0% vs expected
Julie Kawahara + Lori Anderson4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Francesca Hernaez
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Amy Putty
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Yeli Hohban
24W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.86
Vivi Zhang
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Soo Pae
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Lori Reading-Foster
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sylvia McCarthy
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Michelle Weeks
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tatiana Shakulina
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Alisha Testa
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Laurie Hanschu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lori Anderson
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Maribel Gregory
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Julie Kawahara
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lauren Pugh
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Margie Sasaura
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
Janelle Schultz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Leigh McNeely
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.