Teams

Spirit Park - Kennedy

2026 Combo 18 & Over Women Night - Mobile · 5.5 Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 2.62 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-13vs Spirit Park - MiddletonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRandi Stewart / Amanda Ruland vs Salmedina Alic / Hannah Broich7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Shirley / Kim Sedergran vs Fiona Stoner / Kelly Reynolds1-6, 2-6
2026-07-06vs MTC - PittsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Wiggins / Randi Stewart vs Tyneisha Newkirk / Emily Dolan3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Williams / Tara Hall vs Elizabeth Hughes / Kellie Eck7-5, 6-1
2026-06-28vs Fairhope - Grissom/KaempferLost 01
L#2 DoublesTara Hall / Amanda Ruland vs Aubrey Pugh / FARRIN ABLES1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-22vs Fairhope - Watts/BahouthLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Wiggins / Katie Ward vs Taylor Kessler / Beth Peters4-6, 2-6
2026-06-08vs MTC - Lee/KennedyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ruland / Leslea Wallis vs Jordan Kennedy / Madelyn St. John2-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs MTC - NicholsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Kennedy / Amanda Ruland vs Allison Phillips / Megan Jordan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 5.5 Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spirit Park - Middleton511449103
2MTC - Lee/Kennedy5114411145
3Fairhope - Grissom/Kaempfer5112613120
4MTC - Pitts3371124177
5MTC - McNeil225714107
6Fairhope - Watts/Bahouth237817136
7CCM - Seifert2481024185
8Spirit Park - Kennedy2471126194
9MTC - Nicholson1441123147
10Lott Park - Emmertson1561226176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Amanda Ruland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Michelle Stockman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.41
Jane Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Danielle Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
April White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Kim Sedergran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Lauren Latham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.27
Randi Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
2.25
Heather Horton
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Leslea Wallis
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.15
Tara Hall
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Stockman + Lauren Latham6363% games+4.3% vs expected
Randi Stewart + Tara Hall3744% games+3.1% vs expected
Randi Stewart + Michelle Stockman213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Stockman + April White213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Stockman + Leslea Wallis213 matchesnot enough data
April White + Amanda Ruland213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Latham + Heather Horton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Ruland
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Michelle Stockman
18W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.56
Jane Wiggins
13W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Danielle Williams
4W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
April White
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Kim Sedergran
27W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
Lauren Latham
19W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Randi Stewart
21W–30L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Heather Horton
21W–15L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Leslea Wallis
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Tara Hall
19W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.