Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW4.5B

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.15
Angelita Vallejo
published 4.5
4.11
Noriko Swanson
published
4.08
Kimi Watada
published
4.06
Martha Matrisian
published
4.03
Julia Porter
published
4.02
Karlene Steelman
published
3.95
Marina Wills
published
3.93
Marcy Sharafian
published
3.89
Euna Roh
published 4
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.77
Raquel Atkin
published
3.75
Andrea Callaway
published 4
3.71
Babe Franey
published 4
3.67
Stephanie Kasirajan
published
3.53
Liliana Wang
published
3.34
Sarah Russell
published
Kimiko Kearney
published
Lysbet Verlenden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelita Vallejo + Chandra Thomas7165% games−1.1% vs expected
Jill Van Slyke + Raquel Atkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Angelita Vallejo
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Noriko Swanson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
Kimi Watada
19W–23L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.08
Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Julia Porter
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
Karlene Steelman
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
Marina Wills
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
Marcy Sharafian
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Euna Roh
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.81
Raquel Atkin
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
Andrea Callaway
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Babe Franey
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Stephanie Kasirajan
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Liliana Wang
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Sarah Russell
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.34
Kimiko Kearney
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lysbet Verlenden
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.