Teams

Team 1 Arlington Aces III

2022 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-10vs Team 2 Volley Ranchers 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesRaman Batish / Laura Seybold vs Eduardo Castro / Sissel Bakken6-2, 5-5
2022-06-05vs Team 3 Smart AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Tara Jefferson vs Jeffrey Gill / Sharon Sabasteanski0-6, 0-6
2022-06-02vs Team 4 Cheval 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Kim / Tara Jefferson vs Jose Miguel Sacin / Susan Velasco5-7, 5-6
L#3 DoublesRaman Batish / Elisa Joyner vs Robert Smith / Carrie Gray0-6, 0-6
2022-05-21vs Team 5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelly Briscoe / Raman Batish vs Maria Sinnott / Edson Gregory4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-18vs Team 6Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTara Jefferson / Dan Wagener vs Rohit Munjal / Joan-Marie Turchiano0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Wilson / Raman Batish vs Diane Fletcher / Keith Wojciech1-6, 3-6
2022-05-11vs Team 3 Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesElisa Joyner / Javier Alvar vs Mary Krueger / Jason Olson0-6, 1-6
2022-04-27vs Team 6Split 11
L#1 DoublesPJ Barbour / Elisa Joyner vs David Harvey / Holly Rasmussen1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRaman Batish / Shelly Briscoe vs Daniel Aronowitz / Joan-Marie Turchiano6-4, 3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Raman Batish
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Dan Wagener
published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Tara Jefferson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Elisa Joyner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jon Felts
published
Kiet Ly
published
Shelly Briscoe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Raman Batish
77W–117L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Dan Wagener
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Tara Jefferson
185W–158L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Elisa Joyner
56W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Jon Felts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kiet Ly
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Briscoe
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.