Teams

A10 MAC Mavericks Bates

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-23vs A1 Acac Jones/FlournoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesErich Yost / Lisa Yost vs Glenn Pfluger / Julie Rison1-6, 1-6
2022-10-22vs A2 Avalon GeorgeLost 01
L#3 DoublesToni Bolden-Ealey / Erich Yost vs Andrew Armstrong / Jennifer Manring2-6, 3-6
2022-10-02vs A7 Bon Air WadeLost 01
L#1 DoublesErich Yost / Lisa Yost vs Aris Bearse / Martha Rhodes1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Katie Hambrick
published
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Allen Dodd
published 3.5
3.22
Michelle Mouer
published
3.08
Jason Yost
published
2.95
Bernice White
published 3
2.93
Lisa Yost
published
2.85
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.85
Lance Pessarra
published
2.81
Kim Boys
published
2.77
Sue Mathe
published
2.65
Susanna Dodd
published
2.63
Ruth Bates
published
2.62
Morris White
published
Toni Bolden-Ealey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morris White + Bernice White044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Hambrick
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Allen Dodd
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Mouer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Jason Yost
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Bernice White
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lisa Yost
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Anne Wolff
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Lance Pessarra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
Sue Mathe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Susanna Dodd
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Ruth Bates
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Morris White
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Toni Bolden-Ealey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.