Teams

OC CMTC - Q

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 3.5 M

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-12-20vs OC Costa Mesa TamWon 30
W#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Brandon Sovik4-0
W#2 SinglesQ Viet Tran vs Tam Nguyen6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Steven Sun6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTed Shang vs Hien Phan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Martin vs Weixi Hu6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Colin Gui3-6, 4-6
2025-12-07vs OC Costa Mesa TamWon 20
W#2 SinglesFiras Kassem vs James Jiang6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChuck Choi vs Tam Nguyen6-1, 6-2
2025-12-06vs OC Costa Mesa TamWon 20
W#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Brandon Sovik6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBRYAN NGUYEN vs Matt Straathof6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-30vs OC YLCC - Neb/PaulWon 30
W#1 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Paul Huante6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesQ Viet Tran vs Neb Petrovacki6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesTed Shang vs Alan Levenson6-2, 6-1
2025-11-09vs OC YLCC - Neb/PaulWon 20
W#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Kaustubh Deshpande6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Allen Whitten6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Colin Gui2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Xin Zeng4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTed Shang vs Weixi Hu6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs OC YLCC - Neb/PaulWon 21
W#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Jeremy Rose6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFiras Kassem vs Paul Huante6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChuck Choi vs Allen Whitten1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Xin Zeng6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTed Shang vs Chahan Fu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesQ Viet Tran vs Lei Diao6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Martin vs Weixi Hu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesQ Viet Tran vs Lance Palme6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBRYAN NGUYEN vs Lei Diao6-4, 7-5
2025-09-28vs OC YLCC - Neb/PaulLost 02
L#1 SinglesChuck Choi vs Paul Huante4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBRYAN NGUYEN vs Martin Langpap2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5 M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Ryan Martin
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
3.64
Firas Kassem
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
3.38
Ted Shang
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.31
Q Viet Tran
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.30
BRYAN NGUYEN
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Chuck Choi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Martin
19W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Firas Kassem
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Ted Shang
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Q Viet Tran
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
BRYAN NGUYEN
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Chuck Choi
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.