Teams

Wilson/Parker Tri

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER · WOMEN TRI 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-23vs Hopson trilevelSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTaylor Waddle / Kylie Knapp vs Laurie Sullivan / Tracie McCabe1-4
W#3 DoublesSue Fuller / Julia Mattingly vs Brittany Savoca / Molly Hanly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-11vs Hopson trilevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Mathias-Hinson / Carolyn Hickman vs Cari Hopson / Ashley Novak4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Porcelli / Ashley Doyle vs Melissa Straub / Tracie McCabe7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCorinne Monahan / Brie Pettid vs Paola Marie Colon Barbosa / Frances Kelly5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-07vs Hopson trilevelWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnna Porcelli / Ashley Doyle vs Laurie Sullivan / Tracie McCabe6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSue Fuller / Brie Pettid vs Molly Hanly / Julia Griffin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-31vs Hopson trilevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Parker / Helen Mathias-Hinson vs Cari Hopson / Ashley Novak6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTaylor Waddle / Kylie Knapp vs Tracie McCabe / Julie Cooke3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Mattingly / Brie Pettid vs Heather Senter / Brittany Savoca4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN TRI 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Helen Mathias-Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Renata Kuperus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Krystal Glasgow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Carolyn Hickman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Lindsay Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Anna Porcelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Kylie Knapp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Taylor Waddle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Ashley Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Julia Mattingly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Brie Pettid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Sue Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Corinne Monahan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Linda Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Porcelli + Taylor Waddle4168% games+14.2% vs expected
Corinne Monahan + Brie Pettid5258% games+3.5% vs expected
Renata Kuperus + Krystal Glasgow5082% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Parker + Krystal Glasgow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Helen Mathias-Hinson
20W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Renata Kuperus
83W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Krystal Glasgow
77W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Carolyn Hickman
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Lindsay Parker
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Anna Porcelli
25W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Kylie Knapp
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Taylor Waddle
40W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ashley Doyle
22W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Julia Mattingly
59W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Brie Pettid
24W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sue Fuller
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Corinne Monahan
33W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.