Teams

GEN RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs BP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathy Carver / Tammy Roth vs Heather Moody / Gabrielle Mattioda7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hamm vs Samantha Hanfelder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Theander / Colleen Wilkinson vs Miriam Tapia Salinas / Gabriela Flora4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMalou van Eijk / Holly Harrison vs Francine Gonzales / Pamela Trujillo6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2021-07-12vs NJ NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Hamm / Becky Theander vs Mary Nelson / Tricia Yeo0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Carver / Birgit Heine vs Jennifer Stiebeling / Mandy Coughlin7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Hughes / Sharon Naylor vs Cynthia Adams / Kirstin Kraig6-7, 2-6
2021-07-05vs MC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Roth / Colleen Wilkinson vs Dorothy Monroe / Rene Meale2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hamm vs Megan Melucci6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBirgit Heine / Julie Hughes vs Inge Bentz / Natalie Bailey2-6, 1-6
2021-06-28vs HIW GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSharon Naylor / Tammy Roth vs Jeri Gardner / Sarah Salmen6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hamm vs Jill Aafedt6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMalou van Eijk / Birgit Heine vs Jennifer Burchfield / Leslie Simms2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBecky Theander / Holly Harrison vs Alice Peters / Shannon Taylor6-2, 6-4
2021-06-21vs RHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMalou van Eijk / Birgit Heine vs Linda Wilson / Sally Landmark3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Harrison / Lauren Dolian vs Anne Steputis / Laura Caldwell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Naylor / Colleen Wilkinson vs Elizabeth Ott / Nancy Progar3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-14vs NJ GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSharon Naylor / Becky Theander vs Melba Castaneda / Ann Stafford6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarrie Hamm vs Julie Clapham2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBirgit Heine / Malou van Eijk vs Sandra Lucero Jacquez / Leigh Hebert2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Dolian / Kathy Carver vs Alexandra Fortna / Nikole Randolph1-6, 2-6
2021-06-07vs BP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSharon Naylor / Malou van Eijk vs Karan Tierney / Hilaria Davis1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Hamm vs Leslie Lane3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Carver / Tammy Roth vs Jennifer Swartwout / Jodi Frangiamore4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Harrison / Lauren Dolian vs Susan Gallo / Miki Aylesworth3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BM TEAL42141024211
2GEN RED1672144303
3PTC TEAL0732551327

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie Hamm
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Holly Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Sharon Naylor
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Tammy Roth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Colleen Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Malou van Eijk
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Becky Theander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Birgit Heine
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kathy Carver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Dolian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Roth + Sharon Naylor10752% games−3.0% vs expected
Tammy Roth + Malou van Eijk4639% games−4.1% vs expected
Holly Harrison + Colleen Wilkinson2440% games−6.8% vs expected
Tammy Roth + Colleen Wilkinson2737% games−6.9% vs expected
Holly Harrison + Malou van Eijk11236% games−7.0% vs expected
Malou van Eijk + Birgit Heine0837% games−7.3% vs expected
Malou van Eijk + Sharon Naylor41439% games−7.6% vs expected
Kathy Carver + Malou van Eijk2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Hamm
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Holly Harrison
28W–77L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Sharon Naylor
56W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Tammy Roth
37W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Colleen Wilkinson
6W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Malou van Eijk
31W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Becky Theander
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Birgit Heine
3W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy Carver
13W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Dolian
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.