Teams

SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5+A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 2.5+

11 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-03vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5+A-DTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDena McManis / Allison Weinstein vs Bella Shirin / Cindy Eldridge4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVi Le / Juliana Bryant vs Katherine Young / Elizabeth Ackerman4-6, 0-6
2025-05-20vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Weinstein / Heather Young vs Taryn Moore / Bella Shirin6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKate Woodcox vs Cindy Eldridge6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJuliana Bryant / Vi Le vs Laura Giverts / Nicole Carter Mcgill3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-30vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Young / Allison Weinstein vs Meghan Jacobowitz / Sarah Roufa2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKate Woodcox vs Bella Shirin6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusie Chao / Jennifer Walker vs Tania Berenjian / Elizabeth Ackerman6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Daralisa Kelley
published 3
2.57
Allison Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Jennifer Acker
published
2.39
Dena McManis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Susie Chao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Karen Yoo
published
2.25
Leah Branson
published
2.21
Kate Woodcox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.18
Juliana Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Caedmon Patalano
published 2.5
1.75
Cindy Yang
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dena McManis + Allison Weinstein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daralisa Kelley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
2.5
Allison Weinstein
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Jennifer Acker
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Dena McManis
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Susie Chao
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.36
Karen Yoo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Leah Branson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Kate Woodcox
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Juliana Bryant
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Caedmon Patalano
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Cindy Yang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.