Teams

Shirley/Maumelle/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over Novice · 2.5 Novice - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-22vs Team Burns ParkLost 12
L#1 SinglesShelby Thornton vs Brooke Fixler2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMarda Isbell vs Katie Grice1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKristi Shirley vs Amber Kellogg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-12-11vs Hughes/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 SinglesKirby Wells vs Kelli Rawn6-7, 3-2
L#2 SinglesMelissa Herbert vs Cristie Hughes5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Mary Claire McLaurin1-6, 1-6
2024-12-10vs Laureano/NLR/LTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristi Shirley vs Chanda Price6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShelby Thornton vs Jennifer Compton4-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesMelissa Herbert vs Kathy Davidson6-2, 6-1
2024-11-19vs Laureano/NLR/LTCLost 12
W#1 SinglesKirby Wells vs Chanda Price6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Jennifer Compton0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMartina Davis vs Stephanie Byers1-6, 0-6
2024-11-13vs Team Burns ParkWon 30
W#1 SinglesShelby Thornton vs Nathalie Pineda6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKatherine Kilian vs Katie Grice6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKristi Shirley vs Lisa Hunt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Novice - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jared Compton
published
2.34
Kristi Shirley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.13
Constance Lovelace
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.08
Melissa Herbert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Katherine Kilian
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kirby Wells
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Marda Isbell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Martina Davis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Shelby Thornton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Compton
39W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Kristi Shirley
21W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Constance Lovelace
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Melissa Herbert
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Katherine Kilian
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kirby Wells
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marda Isbell
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Martina Davis
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shelby Thornton
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.