Teams

EPease (Piper Glen)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-29vs TRosenberg (CSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllyson McDonough / Katy Walters vs Amy Ingalls / Kyna Savedge6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMisty Jones / Cynthia Hoover vs Tracey Rosenberg / Emily Kennedy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Sarah Garner vs Lisa Baker / Heather Griffith6-4, 7-5
2023-09-28vs LRosser (Colonel Beatty)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMisty Jones / Cynthia Hoover vs Kate Loor / Diana Kilponen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Amanda Cheek vs Melissa Habegger / Kimi Parker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllyson McDonough / Kristy Simonich vs Laurie Rosser / Vicki King6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAngela Donathan / Sarah Garner vs Janine Geada / Kim Ransom6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Pease / TAMMIE BRANDT vs Lorna O'Callaghan / Elizabeth Kyle6-1, 6-0
2023-09-15vs NFitzgerald (Springfield)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMisty Jones / Cynthia Hoover vs Volree Wade / Maureen Paterson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Pease / TAMMIE BRANDT vs Natalie Fitzgerald / Erica Turkus6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlicia Fink / Katy Walters vs Mary Stewart Chatman / Kelly Treble6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-08vs LRosser (Colonel Beatty)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlicia Fink / Katy Walters vs Melissa Habegger / Julie Strack6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngela Donathan / Laura Fox vs Kate Loor / Christina Waddell0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMisty Jones / Cynthia Hoover vs Mona Rhee / Susan Ochs7-6, 6-0
2023-09-01vs DShealy/TRand (Firethorne)Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Pease / Allyson McDonough vs Danielle Shealy / Shalini Patel7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Sonia Waters vs Patty Swan / Diane Hegele6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Sarah Garner vs Breck Lindley / Caroline Lattanzi6-2, 6-3
2023-08-25vs LCranford (Sardis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllyson McDonough / Kristy Simonich vs Valerie Gray / Cathie DeCramer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlicia Fink / Katy Walters vs Elizabeth Tabor / Sandra Holmes6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Laura Fox vs Linda Cranford / Susan Crosby6-0, 6-0
2023-08-11vs TRosenberg (CSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Pease / Allyson McDonough vs Tracey Rosenberg / Ann Meadows6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTAMMIE BRANDT / Amy LaPenta vs Sameena Hassan / Renee Foster1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Sonia Waters vs Emily Kennedy / Stacy Beard6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Cynthia Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.69
Emily Pease
published 4
3.55
Allyson McDonough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.44
Sonia Waters
published
3.29
Amanda Cheek
published 3.5
Angela Donathan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Misty Jones
published
3.13
Tiffany Kopittke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
TAMMIE BRANDT
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Sarah Garner
published
3.01
Alicia Fink
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Katy Walters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kopittke + Emily Pease6549% games−0.5% vs expected
Angela Donathan + Allyson McDonough7164% gamesnot enough data
Misty Jones + Emily Pease314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Pease + Allyson McDonough134 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Fink + Allyson McDonough224 matchesnot enough data
Angela Donathan + Alicia Fink123 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Fink + Amanda Cheek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Hoover
303W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.69
4
Emily Pease
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Allyson McDonough
198W–56L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.55
Sonia Waters
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Amanda Cheek
32W–44L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Angela Donathan
85W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Misty Jones
27W–30L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Tiffany Kopittke
79W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
TAMMIE BRANDT
50W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sarah Garner
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Alicia Fink
101W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Katy Walters
22W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.