Teams

KY/LOU/DASHTI

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.05 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-02vs KY/LOU/OCONNELLLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bowling / Betsy Touma vs Caitlin Mann / Abby Schuhmann1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarmen Schreiber vs Courtney Pierron6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHelen Dashti / Anna Feitelson vs Sarah Jane Dufour / Mary Beth Zarobsky1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Lauren Whitsell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Johnson / Amy Dishman vs Claire Schroering / Peyton Hobson1-6, 0-6
2025-01-20vs KY/LOU/BROWNFIELD/OCONNELLWon 50
W#1 DoublesJennifer Reeder / Brenda Stofer vs Suzanne Bush / Allison Blaney6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarmen Schreiber vs Maggi Donnell6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Feitelson / Sarah Kane-Liu vs Leslie Bailey / Katie Schneider6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLauren Kirby vs Kelly Brownfield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Dashti / Betsy Touma vs Stacey Northup / Melissa Roth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-19vs KY/LOU/LAMPTON/KULLLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Reeder / Brenda Stofer vs Morgan Bauer / Patricia Hooker0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCarmen Schreiber vs Abbey MacMillan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBetsy Touma / Cheryl Dortch vs Sarah Wilder / Missy Jeffers2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTabitha Collins vs Alisha Kull6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Blythe / Misty Jones vs Natalie Kjellman / Kaitlin Mooney0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Carmen Schreiber
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.99
Jennifer Reeder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.93
Helen Dashti
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.92
Sarah Kane-Liu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.86
Lisa Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Betsy Touma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Beth Blythe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Stefanie Nasca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Cheryl Dortch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Amy Dishman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Brenda Stofer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.70
Anna Feitelson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Heather Kushner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Lauren Kirby
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Stacey Rice
published
Tabitha Collins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Nasca + Helen Dashti10061% games+10.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Bowling + Betsy Touma6266% games+6.8% vs expected
Lisa Gustafson + Jennifer Reeder6460% games+2.5% vs expected
Brenda Stofer + Heather Kushner261554% games+1.8% vs expected
Stacey Rice + Helen Dashti5062% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Dortch + Beth Blythe5069% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Jennifer Reeder3249% gamesnot enough data
Helen Dashti + Betsy Touma5061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carmen Schreiber
52W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
Jennifer Reeder
88W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Helen Dashti
59W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Sarah Kane-Liu
86W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Lisa Gustafson
37W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Betsy Touma
26W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Beth Blythe
32W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Elizabeth Bowling
31W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Stefanie Nasca
24W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Cheryl Dortch
21W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Amy Dishman
34W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Brenda Stofer
84W–64L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Anna Feitelson
21W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Heather Kushner
50W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Lauren Kirby
22W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Stacey Rice
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tabitha Collins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.