Teams

Kim/RB/Foothills

2026 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2026-05-20vs Wilson/HCP/FoothillsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTiffany Varela / Sara Griffith vs Sondra Simmons / Taylor Austin5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Elise Wright6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLydia Sanders / Chloee Dula vs Julie Wilson / Mindy Murray5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Sain / Amy Cody vs Jennifer Dufour / Estera Biscos4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-19vs Barefoot/Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Varela / Lydia Sanders vs Marsha Diamonti / Sara Wimmer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-06vs Henderson/DV/FoothillsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Sain / Jodi Sanders vs Alexa Gerbrands / Lisa Cooper7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Jill Reese6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLydia Sanders / Chloee Dula vs Whitney Shuman / Colleen Sharkey2-6, 5-7
2026-05-05vs Scott/Ymca/foothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeAnna Finger / Neeley Campbell vs Jenette Swisher / Helen Woy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-29vs Barefoot/LHCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Cody / Roxanna Clay vs Meghan Young / Rosemary Skoog0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChloee Dula / Maile Kim vs Tisha Zagaroli / Holly Barefoot2-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs Oakley/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 SinglesNeeley Campbell vs Shelby Graff6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-21vs Westphal/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesNeeley Campbell vs Lisa Houser3-6, 5-7
2026-04-01vs Collins-Long/PC/FoothillsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaile Kim / Andrea Sain vs Sandra Reid / Staci Shafer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Mackenzie Hoyt6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChloee Dula vs Amy Harline6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Jodi Sanders vs Emily Fisher / Kelly Meier6-7, 2-6
2026-03-31vs Barefoot/Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Varela / Danielle Curwood vs Tisha Zagaroli / Mindy Bolick6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-25vs Henderson/DV/FoothillsWon 31
L#1 DoublesRoxanna Clay / Andrea Sain vs Yuriko Roten / Carrie Henderson0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Carrie Caviness6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTiffany Varela vs Jill Reese6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJodi Sanders / Chloee Dula vs Whitney Shuman / Sarah Long6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-18vs Barefoot/LHCC/FoothillsLost 23
L#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Maile Kim vs Rosemary Skoog / Erika Rowland4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Tisha Zagaroli3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoxanna Clay / Sara Griffith vs Meghan Young / Mindy Bolick5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTiffany Varela vs Sara Wimmer6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Sanders / Jodi Sanders vs Marsha Diamonti / Linda Shuford6-7, 2-6
2026-03-17vs Oakley/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaile Kim / Danielle Curwood vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Tracy Kiefer0-6, 5-7
2026-03-11vs Wilson/HCP/FoothillsLost 13
L#1 SinglesAdisyn Eckard vs Taylor Austin6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTiffany Varela / Lydia Sanders vs Mindy Murray / Megan Reid1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChloee Dula vs Karen Shokes3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJodi Sanders / Roxanna Clay vs Aleshia Abernathy / Julie Wilson3-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs Westphal/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Maile Kim vs Madison Ogden / Mandy Poplin5-7, 3-6
2026-02-25vs Collins-Long/PC/FoothillsWon 40
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Tiffany Varela vs Catherine Lundberg / Kelly Emoff6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNeeley Campbell vs Mackenzie Hoyt6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Griffith / Roxanna Clay vs Christina Long / Sandra Reid3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChloee Dula / Maile Kim vs Ana Paula Schweitzer / Kathy Collins6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Danielle Curwood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.54
Neeley Campbell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.51
Tiffany Varela
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Adisyn Eckard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Andrea Sain
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Katherine Trask
published 3.5
3.14
Maile Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.10
Chloee Dula
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3
2.98
Roxanna Clay
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Jodi Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
2.78
Amy Cody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Mitzi Arrowood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maile Kim + Andrea Sain4249% games−0.3% vs expected
Mitzi Arrowood + Amy Cody365246% games−1.3% vs expected
Roxanna Clay + Jodi Sanders033 matchesnot enough data
Maile Kim + Danielle Curwood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Curwood
204W–137L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
Neeley Campbell
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Tiffany Varela
62W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Adisyn Eckard
5W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Andrea Sain
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Katherine Trask
34W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Maile Kim
24W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Chloee Dula
80W–48L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Roxanna Clay
69W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Jodi Sanders
20W–13L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amy Cody
88W–132L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Mitzi Arrowood
123W–165L career · 8 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.