Teams

GR-Thigpen (18s 6.5W C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-25vs GCC-Blount (18s 6.5W C)Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Thigpen / Paige Temple vs Martha Whitesides / Kerry Smith3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Elise / Jessica Beissner vs Nicole Carlyle / Azita Movahed7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs GCC-Blount (18s 6.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesConnor Hardison / Jessica Beissner vs Kerry Smith / KENNEDY BLOUNT2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKascia Henderson / Mary Hardison vs Nicole Blount / Martha Whitesides6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Elise / Kelli Dawson vs Diane Pons / Nicole Carlyle5-7, 2-6
2025-09-08vs NB-Corey/Soreff (18s 6.5W C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaige Temple / Rhonda Abbott vs Helen Tyson / Holly Nelson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Beissner / Lakisha Dawson vs Anne Nuckolls / Meredith Alcoke6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Elise / Michelle Langston vs Middleton Hinckley / Jan Mizelle6-7, 3-6
2025-09-06vs NB-Corey/Soreff (18s 6.5W C)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Elise / Debbie Stephenson vs Anne Nuckolls / Meredith Alcoke2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLakisha Dawson / Jessica Beissner vs Holly Nelson / Jessica Lanier6-2, 6-4
2025-09-04vs GCC-Blount (18s 6.5W C)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Thigpen / Paige Temple vs Azita Movahed / Christie Teaney7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelli Dawson / Leslie Lewis vs Jennie Schwartz / Margaret Turner4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKascia Henderson / Rhonda Abbott vs Beth Perkins / Lori Wagner0-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs GCC-Blount (18s 6.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Elise / Mary Hardison vs Mary-Marshall Greene / Jennie Schwartz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKascia Henderson / Jennie Baggett vs Beth Hopkins / Margaret Turner2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLakisha Dawson / Leslie Lewis vs Beth Perkins / Martha Whitesides3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Leslie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Connor Hardison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Ashley Elise
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Paige Temple
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jessica Beissner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Lakisha Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Kascia Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Mary Hardison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Lisa Thigpen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Kristi Geer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Debbie Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kelli Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Jennie Baggett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Michelle Langston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Rhonda Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Thigpen + Debbie Stephenson4158% gamesnot enough data
Kascia Henderson + Ashley Elise3252% gamesnot enough data
Kascia Henderson + Jessica Beissner134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Thigpen + Paige Temple213 matchesnot enough data
Kascia Henderson + Leslie Lewis303 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Beissner + Connor Hardison123 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Baggett + Michelle Langston123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Lewis
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Connor Hardison
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Elise
20W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jessica Beissner
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lakisha Dawson
52W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Kascia Henderson
34W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Mary Hardison
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lisa Thigpen
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Kristi Geer
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Debbie Stephenson
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Kelli Dawson
24W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Jennie Baggett
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
Michelle Langston
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Rhonda Abbott
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.