Teams

Lampton, Ana

2023 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 9.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.62 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Ana Lampton
published 5
4.34
Anna Fiser
published 4.5
4.17
London Breedlove
published
3.92
Caroline Loveless
published 4.5
3.88
Emily Harper
published
3.88
Catherine Lewis
published 4.5
3.77
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ana Lampton
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Anna Fiser
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
London Breedlove
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
4.17
4.5
Caroline Loveless
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.92
Emily Harper
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
4.5
Catherine Lewis
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.88
MAYRA PRADO CONTRERAS
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.