Teams

Chisholm

2025 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Angela Griffin
published 4
3.85
Jamaine Chisholm
published
3.81
Mark Chisholm
published
3.77
Yolanda Alexander
published
3.75
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.74
3.73
Samuel Hughes
published
3.68
Charlene Collier
published 4
3.38
Albert Hardeman
published 3.5
3.38
Deborah Pugh
published 3.5
Larry Johnson
published
Marion Boone
published
Stacey Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Derek Owens + Jamaine Chisholm3347% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Derek Owens + Cecilia Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Griffin
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Jamaine Chisholm
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Mark Chisholm
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Yolanda Alexander
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–53L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Curtis Derek Owens
24W–32L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Samuel Hughes
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.73
4
Charlene Collier
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Albert Hardeman
34W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Deborah Pugh
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Larry Johnson
23W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marion Boone
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Carey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.