Teams

KY/LOU/HARRIS/MASON

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-19vs KY/LOU/PRZEWORSKI/REEDERLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarrie Price-Kerr / Stephanie Mason vs Lisa Mercado / Christine Przeworski2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMallory Caldwell vs Julie Nakayima2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Mallory Caldwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Karen Sturm
published
3.18
Stephanie Mason
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.07
Barrie Price-Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Amanda Reasor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Katherine McFarland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Jessica Bethards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Victoria Conway
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Sara Ruby
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Alexandra Lamar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kim Orick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Elisabeth Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lynn Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Lisa Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth McIntyre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jody Lorenz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Harris + Stephanie Mason5747% games+8.5% vs expected
Amanda Reasor + Jessica Bethards9456% games+8.4% vs expected
Kim Orick + Stephanie Mason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Caldwell
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Karen Sturm
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Stephanie Mason
31W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Barrie Price-Kerr
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Amanda Reasor
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Katherine McFarland
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jessica Bethards
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Victoria Conway
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Sara Ruby
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Alexandra Lamar
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kim Orick
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Elisabeth Gray
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Lynn Harris
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lisa Marsh
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Elizabeth McIntyre
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jody Lorenz
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.