Teams

DVyas-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs JByrd7.5-DURWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Ryan / Dipen Vyas vs Tevin Wilson / Daniel Allen6-4, 6-4
2025-10-01vs JByrd7.5-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesDash Rajarajhan / Dipen Vyas vs Youngjun Lee / Daniel Allen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-20vs MHanauer-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Joshua Lundberg vs Scott Benson / Chris Combs3-6, 2-6
2025-09-12vs AJoshi-DURLost 01
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Nick Byrne vs Michael Weslander / Vidit Desai2-6, 1-6
2025-09-06vs TCarroll-DURLost 01
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Benjamin Albright vs Rawle Sue-Ho / Visakan Jayakumar2-6, 0-6
2025-08-24vs JByrd27.5-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Dash Rajarajhan vs Byron Byars / Kevin Williams7-5, 6-1
2025-08-17vs NPuri18-DURWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndres Pineda / Dash Rajarajhan vs Sushrut Bhowmik / Divy D6-1, 6-1
2025-08-08vs JMontague-DURLost 01
L#3 DoublesDipen Vyas / Evan Dorner vs Brian Noga / Barry Gooch4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Seth Layton
published
3.79
Juan Andrade
published
3.75
Jonathan Ryan
published
3.67
Lucas Hubbard
published
3.57
Aaron Stewart
published 4
3.47
Trung Tran
published
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Dash Rajarajhan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Nick Byrne
published
3.26
Ethan Holston
published
3.23
Jeff Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dipen Vyas + Dash Rajarajhan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seth Layton
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Juan Andrade
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Jonathan Ryan
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Lucas Hubbard
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Aaron Stewart
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Trung Tran
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.47
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–140L career · 7 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
3.5
Dash Rajarajhan
66W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Nick Byrne
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Ethan Holston
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Jeff Franklin
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.