Teams

ACheek/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-28vs JMorse/KJones (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Larry Gao vs Ivan Blakeney / Abbey Ellis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Roach / Zak Gilbert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-07vs RAddison/KMoore (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLiesl Graf / Zak Gilbert vs Anna Margaret Hutchins / Alex Hutchins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-30vs PKartes/MKleber (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSJ Pragasam / Larry Gao vs Patrick Blandford / Laura Grant2-6, 3-6
2025-06-27vs MBurns (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Larry Gao vs Jasmine Fontaine / Maksym Mikhart7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLiesl Graf / Drew Turney vs Olya Banchik / Leon Banchik6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-23vs NBadr/CJacobs (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kennard / Larry Gao vs Peggy Hoffman / Zhen Zu4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennings Cheek / Brooke Leonnig vs Michael Chaffman / Kristen Agee4-6, 3-6
2025-06-09vs SCochran/JCochran (Lifetime)Split 11
L#2 DoublesJennings Cheek / Brooke Leonnig vs Daniel Malecki / Leidys Pinzon6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZak Gilbert / Elizabeth Kennard vs CJ ONeill / Van ONeill7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-02vs APurmort (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesZak Gilbert / Elizabeth Kennard vs Allison Purmort / Antonio Farrington7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLiesl Graf / Drew Turney vs Spencer Stoakley / Jonathan Diaz7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Danny Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Elizabeth Kennard
published
3.41
Larry Gao
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Sai Venky Ganduri
published
3.36
Brooke Leonnig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Cheek
published 3.5
3.27
SJ Pragasam
published
3.02
Erin Roach
published
2.95
Zak Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Liesl Graf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karissa Chaplinsky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Vazquez
70W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Elizabeth Kennard
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Larry Gao
62W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Sai Venky Ganduri
27W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brooke Leonnig
132W–149L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Amanda Cheek
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
SJ Pragasam
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Erin Roach
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Zak Gilbert
45W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Liesl Graf
91W–119L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Karissa Chaplinsky
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.