Teams

McRee

2025 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 4.5 Mens

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-07vs AlvarezWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan McDonald / Thomas Farris vs Joe Alvarez / Michael Hastings6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarson Bolton / Carson Dyess vs Harrison Marsh / Don Hosch6-0, 6-3
2025-04-30vs AlvarezWon 21
W#1 DoublesMel McRee / Thomas Farris vs Don Hosch / Trenton Flores6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIan McDonald / Carson Dyess vs Reese Cook / Michael Hastings7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCaleb Cox / Matthew Henderson vs Joe Alvarez / Aidan Alvarez6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-16vs AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesIan McDonald / Carson Dyess vs Michael Hastings / Harrison Marsh6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Henderson / Caleb Cox vs Reese Cook / Robert Chon Garcia3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarson Bolton / Thomas Farris vs Joe Alvarez / Don Hosch6-1, 6-1
2025-04-02vs AlvarezWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarson Dyess / Ian McDonald vs Michael Hastings / Harrison Marsh6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Henderson / Caleb Cox vs Trenton Flores / Reese Cook4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mens have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Carson Bolton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.48
Mel McRee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Caleb Cox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Thomas Farris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Carson Dyess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Ian McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Matthew Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Henderson + Caleb Cox123 matchesnot enough data
Carson Dyess + Ian McDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carson Bolton
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Mel McRee
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Caleb Cox
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Farris
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Carson Dyess
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Ian McDonald
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Matthew Henderson
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.