Teams

Schoenecker - Chase

2024 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-14vs Fermstad: Top 40Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Stahl / Alejandro Trevino vs Dan Schauer / Jim Terhaar3-6, 4-6
2023-11-30vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 40+ ESLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Weber / Alejandro Trevino vs Cory ONeill / Craig Ballentine2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-11-16vs Goodman: Swillers 24 Early StartLost 01
L#4 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Roy Krengel vs David Goodman / Andrew Baumel2-6, 2-6
2023-11-09vs Jilek/Elfstrum 40+ ESLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Weber / Alejandro Trevino vs Alan Stratton / Mark Wanous2-6, 3-6
2023-10-19vs Ostlund/Tuplano:TBCLost 01
L#4 DoublesPhillip Chase / Alejandro Trevino vs Per Ostlund / CRAIG STERN6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
4.03
Michael Weleczki
published
3.97
Eran Singer
published 4
3.94
Jason Thiner
published
3.94
Joseph Millard
published
3.90
Brian Weber
published 4
3.84
KJ Lynch
published
3.82
Paul Schoenecker
published
Charlie Klein
published 4
3.23
Oscar Oboza
published
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Mark Stahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Millard + Eran Singer6357% games−1.8% vs expected
Jason Thiner + KJ Lynch2340% gamesnot enough data
Paul Schoenecker + Brian Weber4163% gamesnot enough data
Eran Singer + Brian Weber4157% gamesnot enough data
Paul Schoenecker + Eran Singer224 matchesnot enough data
Jason Thiner + Eran Singer303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Millard + Brian Weber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
Michael Weleczki
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Eran Singer
41W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
Jason Thiner
90W–87L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Joseph Millard
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Brian Weber
36W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
KJ Lynch
31W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Paul Schoenecker
45W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Charlie Klein
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Oscar Oboza
25W–23L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Mark Stahl
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.