Teams

Yadkin/Johnson/18 3.5 Singles

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - Monday Night

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-04vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesFelice Manget Harvey vs Hannah Giles1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCarol Parker vs Nancy Hart0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Mustin vs JoAnn White1-6, 0-6
2025-07-21vs Yadkin/Bryan/18 3.5/OTLost 02
L#1 SinglesHillary Stevens vs Brandi Jacques7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMariela Arias vs Callie Bartock1-6, 5-7
2025-07-18vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesEmily Mustin vs Nora Ferrell2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCarol Parker vs JoAnn White1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMariela Arias vs Whitley Sheffield3-6, 1-6
2025-06-30vs Yadkin/Bryan/18 3.5/OTLost 12
L#1 SinglesDonna Johnson vs Callie Bartock1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Mustin vs Brandi Jacques1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCarol Parker vs Claire Devon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-23vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesFelice Manget Harvey vs Melissa Faulkner0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Mustin vs Hannah Giles0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMariela Arias vs Lauren Timcheck1-6, 6-7
2025-06-09vs Yadkin/Bryan/18 3.5/OTLost 12
L#1 SinglesHillary Stevens vs Jennifer Bryan3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMariela Arias vs Walker Jones2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCarol Parker vs Alissa Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-02vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesDonna Johnson vs Lauren Timcheck2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSherry Tibbs vs Nora Ferrell0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHillary Stevens vs Lori Carpenter0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Monday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Felice Manget Harvey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Hillary Stevens
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.89
Emily Mustin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.78
Donna Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Carol Parker
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
2.58
Sherry Tibbs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mariela Arias
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Felice Manget Harvey
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Hillary Stevens
50W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Emily Mustin
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Donna Johnson
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carol Parker
23W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Sherry Tibbs
4W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Mariela Arias
4W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.