Teams

Thomasville/Thriffiley

2023 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter · MXD 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-07vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Harrison / Rhonda Tullos vs Rhonda Wells / Tom Griffin6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Franson / George Thomas Harrison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-02vs Camilla/ChambersWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Thomas Harrison / Lisa Franson vs Cindy Anglin / Coy Chambers6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDale Wing / Kim Thriffiley vs Garrett Lovell / Brandi Byce6-4, 6-2
2022-12-18vs Camilla/ChambersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Franson / George Thomas Harrison vs Bobby York / Cindy Anglin6-0, 6-1
2022-12-11vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Geoffrey Martin vs Xavier Bell / Carole Floyd4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-11-20vs Bainbridge/HeardLost 02
L#1 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Geoffrey Martin vs Xavier Bell / Carole Floyd2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDale Wing / Kim Thriffiley vs Bob Nunnery / Rhonda Wells7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-13vs Camilla/ChambersWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Geoffrey Martin vs Joan Bassett / Garrett Lovell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGeorge Thomas Harrison / Katrina Walton vs Brandi Byce / Brian Bellamy2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Thomas Harrison
published
3.80
Dale Wing
published 4
3.78
George Thomas Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kim Thriffiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Thriffiley + Rhonda Tullos31437% gamesnot enough data
George Thomas Harrison + Kim Thriffiley2348% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Franson + Kim Thriffiley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Harrison
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Dale Wing
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.80
4
George Thomas Harrison
65W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.