Teams

C 7.5M NC2 Williams

2022 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5M Combo Spring

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-25vs C 7.5M LT KramerLost 01
L#3 DoublesLarry Kistler / David Stucki vs Ryoichi Fujiwara / Ryan Garst3-6, 1-6
2022-02-11Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Burnett / Brett Marlowe vs Ty Gossett / Daniel Chirayath0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaren Rosenberger / Munir Ahmad vs Alexander Simon / Mabruk Quabili0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.5M Combo Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Daren Rosenberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Larry Kistler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brett Marlowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Matthew Radocaj
published
3.13
James McCans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
David Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
David Stucki
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.90
Alan Rante
published 3.5
2.75
Munir Ahmad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mel Paulino
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
William Burnett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daren Rosenberger + David Stucki3442% games−2.2% vs expected
Munir Ahmad + Brett Marlowe5353% gamesnot enough data
Larry Kistler + David Tsai1445% gamesnot enough data
David Stucki + Larry Kistler224 matchesnot enough data
Daren Rosenberger + Mel Paulino123 matchesnot enough data
Daren Rosenberger + Alan Rante033 matchesnot enough data
Daren Rosenberger + Brett Marlowe213 matchesnot enough data
Munir Ahmad + Mel Paulino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daren Rosenberger
76W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Larry Kistler
133W–81L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Brett Marlowe
44W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Radocaj
22W–38L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
James McCans
46W–82L career · 8 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
David Tsai
56W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
David Stucki
58W–83L career · 7 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Alan Rante
19W–38L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Munir Ahmad
111W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Mel Paulino
33W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Burnett
24W–66L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.