Teams

MPTC - Tennisquilla 2.0

2025 HTA Spring NA - Men's Singles Monday · 3.5 Men's Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-24vs LLTC - Z NationLost 13
L#1 SinglesPhilip Me vs Diego Rafael Santos3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesStephen Milton vs Terry Smith3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMicah Matthews vs Edward Tello6-7, 2-6
W#4 SinglesAndy Sa vs Jeffrey Chang7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-24vs LLTC - Z NationSplit 22
W#1 SinglesPhilip Me vs Terry Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMark Powers vs Jeffrey Chang6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBrent Young vs Richard Tam1-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesStephen Milton vs Edward Tello1-6, 1-6
2025-02-03vs LLTC - Z NationWon 31
L#1 SinglesMark Powers vs Kimoon Ryu5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPhilip Me vs Steve Kim5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCesar Salazar vs Jeffrey Chang7-6, 6-2
W#4 SinglesStephen Milton vs Thomas Ayers6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men's Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Philip Me
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.46
Mark Powers
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.46
Kristin Montalvo
published
Cesar Salazar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Milton
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Micah Matthews
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Ron Muehlenbrock
published
3.09
Brent Young
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Andy Sa
usually #4 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Powers + Philip Me10265% games+14.8% vs expected
Stephen Milton + Mark Powers0520% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Milton + Philip Me224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Me
39W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.54
Mark Powers
49W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kristin Montalvo
92W–55L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Cesar Salazar
1W–0L career · type T · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Milton
34W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Micah Matthews
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
Ron Muehlenbrock
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brent Young
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andy Sa
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.