Teams

RJ Tennis All Stars

2022 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-06-23vs Team KimLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Zavilla / Moris Levi vs Eddie Gao / Bo Liang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFred Stein / Robert Etheridge vs Seo Wook Choi / Edward Park0-6, 3-6
2022-06-20vs Team Breaking BadSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Plishker / Fred Stein vs Alberto Zapata / James Rentsch5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Thomas Zavilla vs Juan Carrillo / Curtis Fisher6-4, 5-2
2022-06-17vs Team KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Thomas Zavilla vs Bo Liang / Eddie Gao4-6, 1-6
2022-06-15vs Unstrung HeroesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChandler Fox / Fred Stein vs Craig Pickering / Robert Smith2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Daniel Horning vs Edwin McNicholas / Samuel Zettersten7-6, 2-2
2022-06-12Won 40
W#1 DoublesFred Stein / Chandler Fox vs Ronaldo Cintron / Brian Wheatley6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMoris Levi / Thomas Zavilla vs Christopher Weiland / Robert Wilson7-6, 2-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Etheridge / David Fleming vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs Team RBGCCLost 03
L#2 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Daniel Kim vs Jack Barufka / Tony Colangelo7-6, 2-4
L#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Mel Wesley0-6, 4-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Bartling / Bill Copley vs John DeMoors / Jie Shi2-6, 4-6
2022-05-31vs RacqueteersWon 21
L#1 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Hassaan Karim7-5, 1-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Fleming / Chandler Fox vs Adnan Sadiq / Luan Nguyen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Horning / Thomas Zavilla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-21vs Team RJT M3.0 OneLost 03
L#2 DoublesBill Copley / David Fleming vs Brent Gurney / Vincent Sedwick5-7, 1-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Daniel Aronowitz3-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Moris Levi vs John Glass / John Sparks3-6, 2-6
2022-05-17vs Team Breaking BadWon 30
W#2 DoublesChandler Fox / Bill Copley vs Nicholas Laliberte / Tadeo Martinez6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Juan Carrillo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Etheridge / Moris Levi vs Alberto Zapata / Curtis Fisher4-6, 5-3
2022-05-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesRobert Etheridge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-02vs Team RBGCCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs James Colucci6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBill Copley / Robert Etheridge vs John DeMoors / Jie Shi6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-29vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#2 DoublesChandler Fox / Daniel Kim vs Sameer Farah / Christopher Walker6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYong Jae Lee / Thomas Zavilla vs Chuck Lutes / Chad Smith6-2, 6-3
2022-04-04vs Team RJT M3.0 OneLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Patrick Vergona1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Kim / Thomas Zavilla vs Adinarayana Kalluru / Charles Messing4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChandler Fox / Henry Phillips vs John Sparks / Van Lurton6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Ashwin Vengu
published 3.5
2.89
Matthew Plishker
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.78
Chandler Fox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.62
Bill Copley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Thomas Zavilla
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.52
Robert Etheridge
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.46
John Bartling
published
Yong Jae Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Zavilla + Chandler Fox5844% games+6.7% vs expected
Thomas Zavilla + Robert Etheridge7944% games−9.2% vs expected
Robert Etheridge + Bill Copley2649% gamesnot enough data
Robert Etheridge + Chandler Fox2643% gamesnot enough data
John Bartling + Bill Copley1439% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Zavilla + Bill Copley314 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Zavilla + John Bartling123 matchesnot enough data
Bill Copley + Chandler Fox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashwin Vengu
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Matthew Plishker
55W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Chandler Fox
63W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Bill Copley
21W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Thomas Zavilla
43W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Robert Etheridge
82W–115L career · type A · 10 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
John Bartling
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Yong Jae Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.