LOTC-Pham

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.91 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93

Kevin Hughes

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.92

Nicholas Weaver

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.80

Benjamin Brewer

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.80

Brian Hughes

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.78

Kenya Reutin

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4

3.78

Shane Wilson

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.77

Vu Bui

usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4

3.73

Kyle Cavelti

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.66

Stefan Youngs

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.35

Huy Pham

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.24

Tony Wirth

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Kevin Hughes

102W–52L career

0%91%9%

3.93

Nicholas Weaver

30W–14L career · type A

0%93%7%

3.92

Benjamin Brewer

19W–20L career

2%93%5%

3.80

Brian Hughes

89W–41L career

1%98%1%

3.80

Kenya Reutin

76W–53L career

1%99%1%

3.78

Shane Wilson

15W–13L career

2%97%2%

3.78

Vu Bui

13W–55L career

1%99%0%

3.77

Kyle Cavelti

49W–46L career

4%95%1%

3.73

Stefan Youngs

25W–40L career

9%90%0%

3.66

3.5

Huy Pham

40W–26L career

0%97%3%

3.35

3.5

Tony Wirth

12W–18L career

4%95%1%

3.24

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.