Teams

SATL 4.0M 55 & Over (Catalano)

USTA Adult 55 & Over (3.0-4.0, 9.0) · Men - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-22vs SATL55/Thompson/YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoger Sawyer / Lee Zuber vs Robert Hanks / Rob Hickerson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Hardin / Michael White vs Alan Lyles / Benny Poon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJamie Catalano / Dewey Stroud vs Frank Thompson / Christopher Lawrence6-3, 6-0
2026-03-20vs SATL55/Thompson/YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesLee Zuber / Dewey Stroud vs Rob Hickerson / Gerhard Seyffer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGreg Catalano / Roger Sawyer vs Benny Poon / Christopher Lawrence6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrad Hardin / Michael White vs Alan Lyles / Wei Li6-2, 6-3
2026-03-08vs SATL55/Thompson/YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Zuber / Jamie Catalano vs Rob Hickerson / Gerhard Seyffer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Catalano / Brad Hardin vs Robert Hanks / Wei Li6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL 4.0M 55 & Over (Catalano)3081351
2SATL55/Thompson/YMCA030918107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Brad Hardin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Jamie Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Dewey Stroud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Greg Catalano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Roger Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Lee Zuber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Catalano + Jamie Catalano6066% games+12.8% vs expected
Lee Zuber + Greg Catalano4449% games+7.0% vs expected
Dewey Stroud + Jamie Catalano303 matchesnot enough data
Greg Catalano + Roger Sawyer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Hardin
22W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.05
Jamie Catalano
24W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Dewey Stroud
7W–1L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Greg Catalano
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Roger Sawyer
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Lee Zuber
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.