Teams

Mi.Ladd18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs De.Skiko18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Adams / Dana Rawls vs Laurie Randall / Sharon Lambe6-4, 6-2
2024-10-07vs Me.DeLorme18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Rawls / Molly Briggs vs Jessica McIntyre / Julie Sullivan6-1, 7-5
2024-10-01vs Je.Fogleman18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Jill David vs Kathryn Gerber / Mary Cockrill6-3, 6-3
2024-09-10vs Jo.Lake/Me.Liner18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Danielle Stringer vs Jennifer Bricker / Sherry Ingle4-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs Ra.Mills18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristi Bowser / Heather Slinkard vs Helen Harris / Kana Brinckerhoff2-6, 6-7
2024-08-27vs Cr.Smith18C7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Dana Rawls vs Julie Tuttle / Mary Penn Lunger4-6, 1-6
2024-08-20vs De.Skiko18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Rawls / Molly Briggs vs Amanda Bauer / Diane Werner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Danielle Stringer vs Sherrie Smith / Regina Heroux7-5, 6-4
2024-08-13vs Je.Fogleman18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Danielle Stringer vs Kathryn Gerber / Susan Dubach6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Adams / Dana Rawls vs Elisabeth McMahon / Jennifer Fogleman7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.69
Andra Kinlaw
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Dana Rawls
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Heather Slinkard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Sherrie Lefere
published
3.32
Danielle Stringer
published 3.5
3.32
Holly Lotterhos
published 3.5
3.31
Julia Killian
published
3.14
Jill David
published
Julie Leon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Slinkard + Dana Rawls303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Dana Rawls303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Briggs
34W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Andra Kinlaw
119W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Dana Rawls
129W–111L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Heather Slinkard
78W–107L career · 1 line in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sherrie Lefere
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.32
3.5
Danielle Stringer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Holly Lotterhos
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Julia Killian
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Jill David
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Julie Leon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.