Teams

Bako - Racquet Nation

2024 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.0 - Bake

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-02vs LLW - Bako - Volley GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerry Echeverria / Minda Owens vs Rachel Friesen / Luann Shults6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMiranda Hwang / Marri Tillema vs Cheryl Garone / Nicola Wright4-6, 2-6
2024-05-12vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Buoni / Marri Tillema vs Sheryl Idica Ocampo / Jasmin Batiste6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSUZANNE TEVELDE / Minda Owens vs Tanya Mussatto / Rhea Barrett6-2, 6-0
2024-05-05vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Echeverria / Minda Owens vs Jasmin Batiste / Rhea Barrett7-5, 6-3
2024-04-28vs LLW - Bako - Volley GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesLayne Bone / Marri Tillema vs Lauren Huynh / Krista Rodriguez3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMinda Owens / SUZANNE TEVELDE vs Mia Lagunda / Luann Shults6-2, 6-2
2024-04-07vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 20
W#1 DoublesSUZANNE TEVELDE / Minda Owens vs Grace Lyn Pangaldan / Sheryl Idica Ocampo6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Buoni / Marri Tillema vs Trellis Green / Veronica Palacios Vargas6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24vs LLW - Bako - Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarri Tillema / Minda Owens vs Cheryl Garone / Erika Gatson5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Miranda Hwang
published
2.92
SUZANNE TEVELDE
published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Tracey Barnes
published
2.88
Stacy DeVries
published
2.82
Kyriaki Bouraki
published
2.76
Minda Owens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3
2.74
Brenda Kettler
published 3
2.73
Amanda Buoni
published 3
2.69
Maile Frelinger
published
Jamie Rowe
published
Terry Echeverria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Marri Tillema + Stacy DeVries213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miranda Hwang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
SUZANNE TEVELDE
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Tracey Barnes
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
Stacy DeVries
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Kyriaki Bouraki
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brenda Kettler
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amanda Buoni
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Maile Frelinger
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Jamie Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.