Teams

Grip & Rip

2025 40 & OVER MIXED DOUBLES SUNDAY · 7.0 MXD

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-01vs Double shotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Garcia / Gina Rodriguez vs Raul Ayarzagoitia / Kristin Ortiz0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDennie Huchingson / Brian Huchingson vs Carmen Ahmed / Eric Bond5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Moe / Matthew Muddiman vs Elkin Echeverri / Melba Trevino0-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs Double shotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Josephs / Paul Josephs vs Kirstin Clark / Raul Ayarzagoitia1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNando Gonzalez / Lori Castellaw vs Carmen Ahmed / Eric Bond1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGina Jones / Matthew Muddiman vs Melba Trevino / William Broadnax0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Dennie Huchingson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Sharon Josephs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Brian Huchingson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Garcia
published 3.5
3.14
Paul Josephs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Matthew Muddiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lori Castellaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Nando Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Karen Gauthier
published
2.98
Gina Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Irma Trevino
published 3
2.58
Dianne Moe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Castellaw + Nando Gonzalez1537% games+7.7% vs expected
Paul Josephs + Sharon Josephs2540% games−1.5% vs expected
Matthew Muddiman + Dianne Moe044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dennie Huchingson
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sharon Josephs
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Huchingson
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Andrew Garcia
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Josephs
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Matthew Muddiman
11W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lori Castellaw
29W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Nando Gonzalez
18W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Karen Gauthier
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Gina Rodriguez
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Irma Trevino
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Dianne Moe
20W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.