Teams

Schneiderman/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 7.5 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-29vs Carro/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadelaine Cable / Constance Conley vs Kristen Alexander / Virginia Burbank3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Eckelkamp / Jean Ellen Sisson vs Emily Koelsch / Margaret Johnson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Burns / Virginia Palacio vs Cameron Beedle / Laura Bible6-4, 6-2
2026-08-24vs Davis/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Schneiderman / Jo Picha vs Jennifer Wright / Autumn Rich2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadelaine Cable / Emily Stolnicki vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Rachel Reddin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTrisha Dooley / Jean Ellen Sisson vs Nelli Golmeeva / Kelly Kitabchi7-6, 6-3
2026-08-22vs Wright/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Ellen Sisson / Elizabeth Babcock vs Samantha Ransone / Elizabeth Smith6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVirginia Palacio / Ashley Burns vs Haley Moore / Candace Dunlap7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadelaine Cable / Emily Stolnicki vs Isabel Xu / Kelley Smith6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-18vs Miller/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSophia Runer Folk / Emily Stolnicki vs Jessica Lancaster / Cameron Seay3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTina Schneiderman / Jo Picha vs Sol Weaver / Tricia Pickett7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesConstance Conley / Ashley Burns vs Betsy Miller / Cristy Buziak1-6, 2-6
2026-08-08vs Richards/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Schneiderman / Sophia Runer Folk vs Veronica Anthony / Grace Bann5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Babcock / Madelaine Cable vs Wendy Wood / Constance Dyson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJean Ellen Sisson / Virginia Palacio vs Ann Yackel / Bianca Clayton1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Allison Eckelkamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Sophia Runer Folk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Tina Schneiderman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Madelaine Cable
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Virginia Palacio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Jean Ellen Sisson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Ashley Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jo Picha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Elizabeth Babcock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Emily Stolnicki
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Constance Conley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Palacio + Jo Picha6653% games−1.6% vs expected
Jo Picha + Tina Schneiderman5164% gamesnot enough data
Virginia Palacio + Tina Schneiderman404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Stolnicki + Madelaine Cable134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Eckelkamp
41W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sophia Runer Folk
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Tina Schneiderman
49W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Madelaine Cable
32W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Virginia Palacio
29W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Jean Ellen Sisson
8W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ashley Burns
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Jo Picha
55W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Babcock
37W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Emily Stolnicki
45W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Constance Conley
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.